-
snamione
ask me..
-
Sagojyou
I am awesome. That is all.
-
meliwhat
Culinary arts and animal rights sums it up
-
carsondean98
I'm Carson. :D
-
cynthia1
I really cannot say much because there are so many details. I have a new favorite song every day... I am the sterotypical nerd/dork. I absolutley adore horror/gore films, documentaries, and foreign films. I love Edgar Allan Poe, William Shakspeare and Charles Dickens. You could say that i dont have a life because i spend most of my time writing papers, reading, and listening music. I know all these randomn, insane facts. I am what some may call a conspiricy theorist. Even describing myself is a lot. So i guess if you have any questions just ask :D


(Specifically) Vegetarian Nutritional Deficiencies
4 months ago
So everyone always meets that person who tells you “Oh, I tried being vegetarian once but then I realized I wasn’t getting enough vitamin Q,” picking from a laundry list of nutritional deficiencies to use as an excuse. I had a coworker last month who sited vegetarianism as the cause of her anemia. But You really almost never find any of these people saying “I was vegan but…”
Thinking about this, I think I know why. To a lot of the vegans I know, we look at vegetarians not so much as animal rightists but rather just bloodmouths who like to look special. If you deconstruct the two ideologies, veganism usually says “All sentient life has a right to its own existence and I, nor any other have a right to get in the way of that. I cannot rape imprison another, rape another, kill another etc just because I enjoy it. That is not right and not something I’m comfortable participating in.” On the other hand, vegetarianism comes from a point of view more lenient on the torture and exploitation of those you believe were born lower than you, but says “I was told this is wrong, and there’s sufficient evidence to support that, but I still believe that I’m entitled to be abusive and so I’ll compromise by slightly narrowing my abusive behavior against others.” Still believing at the end of it all that they’re supreme and superior, the vegetarian assumes that this “compromise” that is somehow assumed to be okay with the non-consenting victim is enough, and they look at themself as a better person for “giving up” what they still feel is their right to abuse*.
This is where this becomes relevant to health. This idea of giving up what you’re entitled to leads to that and only that – giving something up. The false virtue in vegetarianism comes from this feeling of giving up and being chastised, the vegetarian is oh so noble because they no longer get to enjoy their precious abuse and as such, they maintain this idea of going without. Vegetarians, so bent on “giving up”, don’t think to replace. They’ll cut something out but then many times won’t think of what nutrients are being lost and what effective plant sources could be used instead. This is why you see nutrient-rich foods like kale being praised and hyped in vegan circles but ignored by most vegetarians. Veganism on the other hand de-objectifies non-human animals and does not view them as a food to give up, but rather just not as a food at all. This mentality leaves plant-based foods as the only real food and rather than placing the eater in the position of someone who has “given up” food it just forces them to look more carefully at what’s available and shows them a different variety, which in turn allows them to sculpt a complete diet from this variety.
Looking at this comparison of “giving up” versus adopting an entirely new spectrum, to me it’s obvious why vegetarianism seems so much more susceptible to nutrition-based issues. Vegetarians put out without bringing in. Obviously these eating habits aren’t uniform throughout the entire respective vegetarian and vegan communities, but it does work as a solid explanation for the phenomenon of vegetarians appearing to get sick more.
*I decided to include this footnote because I’ve been down this road enough to now that every other house on it is occupied by an angry vegetarian waiting to jump out and tell you about how much they actually do care about animal rights. Though this is an entirely different discussion, you still claim to be entitled to abuse others based on species and in the end the mentality isn’t that different from bloodmouths’, if it really is at all. “If you cared, you’d change.”