Last week, we took to Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to ask people to swap out anti-speciesist language for more animal-friendly and inclusive sayings.

Let’s be clear: Asking people to choose their words more carefully isn’t about not hurting the animals’ feelings—it’s about shaping a culture that doesn’t tolerate animal abuse. Taking the simple step of removing anti-animal language isn’t a radical idea—it helps us all be more conscious of the way we view animals. But judging by some people’s reactions to our posts, you’d think we had opened a can of beans.

In this BuzzFeed article, Summer Anne Burton does a great job of explaining why some people are quick to dismiss our suggestion: “Most of you know that what we do to animals to achieve cheap meat at massive scale is wrong, but then you eat the meat anyway. Maybe this is why it’s so appealing to draw attention to vegans and animal activists who seem kooky, annoying, and tone-deaf—it’s a way of changing the subject and of keeping away the creeping feeling that you just might be on the wrong side of history.”

two birds, fence, brown

Our society has worked hard to eliminate racist, homophobic, and ableist language as well as the prejudices that usually accompany it, and now it’s time to address the speciesist language that still runs rampant. (Speciesism is discrimination based on species. It involves viewing members of one species as more important than members of others.) Although PETA has long argued for an end to anti-animal language—we’ve been “bringing home the bagels” since 1980, after all—this issue is in the news now because Shareena Z. Hamzah, a postdoctoral researcher at Swansea University, wrote a blog for The Conversation suggesting that the growing number of vegans will lead to the disappearance of some “meaty” expressions from common usage. This is because, as people evolve, so does our language.

how bigotry begins, respect all animals, speciesism

If you think we’re making a mountain out of a molehill, remember that words matter and that the language we use can have profound repercussions. Speciesism is dangerous. Just as racism and sexism allow harmful practices toward humans in our society to continue, speciesism is what keeps the industries that abuse and kill animals in place.

Using clichés and phrases that trivialize cruelty to animals, such as “There’s more than one way to skin a cat,” or making animals the target of our derogatory language desensitizes us and paves the way for the normalization of violence against animals. Most of us would never support dogfighting, but we still use the phrase, “have a dog in that fight.” And hopefully, we would never “beat a dead horse” (or a live one), but our language suggests otherwise. More and more social justice activists are including animal rights in the conversation, because all social justice movements are centered on campaigning for the rights of those whose voices have not been heard. Billions of cows, pigs, chickens, and other animals every year are condemned to a lifetime of torture and violence, and many people don’t even give them a second thought.

Toronto Chicken Save 

Animals are feeling, intelligent individuals capable of experiencing joy and suffering. They do not exist just to be exploited or killed by humans for hot dogs, wool sweaters, or amusement park attractions. Our language must evolve to reflect this. And there’s another reason why it’s time for a language revolution: because we’re all in this together. Prejudices arise when we start to believe that “I” am important and “you” are not—and that “my” interests somehow outweigh those of other living beings.

Everyone—regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, social class, or species—deserves a life free from harm, and watching our words can help make this possible. Cringeworthy words and phrases don’t belong in modern society. It’s time to get with the program, Our understanding has evolved, and our language should evolve with it.